![]() So it's a certainty that same will be true of the desktop version of Core: it will use Snap, wholly Snap and nothing but Snap. We also know that Ubuntu remixes aren't allowed to include Flatpak any more. It's Snap all the way down, and includes no other packaging system whatsoever. Ubuntu Core is already based around Snap packages. Building your own private 5G is as easy as Wi-FiĪs such, our third conclusion is also a very safe one.An unexpectedly fresh blast from the past, Freespire 9.5 has landed.Debian 12 'Bookworm' is the excitement-free Linux you've been waiting for.Russia tops national leagues in open source downloads.Rather than unpacking them and spraying their contents across the file system, Snap keeps them whole and loop-mounts them to run their contents. Each Snap package is a single, heavily compressed file - as of course are. However, Snap predates all that it was designed for Ubuntu Phone. Somewhat paradoxically, although Canonical was experimenting with a COW-capable file system in the form of ZFS for some years, it now seems to have set this aside. As we discussed before, we feel that we need to specifically mention that tools such as OStree and Flatpak are backed by Red Hat, because this explains some of the technological choices that they make: they are a direct result of the fact that Red Hat does not currently have a next-generation file system capable of copy-on-write snapshots. Flatpak is strongly aimed at graphical desktop applications. The Red Hat-backed Flatpak also uses a similar, and related, toolchain to do its job… only it doesn't work very well for command line apps. Like Git itself, this is very clever, sophisticated, smart - and yet few fully understand exactly how Git works under the hood. It uses a model derived from the Git version control system to distribute operating system binaries. The Red Hat-sponsored Fedora project has several, including Silverblue (GNOME) and Kinoite (KDE) spins – which will soon be joined by the recently announced Onyx, a new immutable edition based on the Budgie desktop. One of the longest standing is Endless OS, version 5 of which we looked at early this year. It's also important to look at the context of existing immutable distributions, of which there are already quite a few. The maintainer of Ubuntu Unity already has his own immutable distro, called blendOS, for instance. Some of the other flavors may of course follow with their own immutable variants. For instance, we know that it will use the GNOME desktop, because that's the only official Ubuntu offering. Secondly, we already know a bit about it, and can safely make a few predictions. On Canonical's GitHub repository, there's already a test build of what will probably be the new desktop edition. So even though Canonical has not yet officially confirmed what the new product's name will be, it will be based on Core 24, with a set of additional packages on top to provide a graphical desktop. We looked at the then-new release about a year ago that was Core 22, the fourth release. Firstly, although this is a new product for Ubuntu, it's not a whole new distribution: although Ubuntu Core is not as well known as mainstream Ubuntu, it's an established product which has been around for years. ![]() As of the next LTS release, which will appear next April, numbered as version 24.04, the standard Ubuntu desktop distro will be joined by a new immutable desktop version, based on the existing Ubuntu Core immutable distribution. Lead Snap developer Oliver Grawert casually dropped the announcement in a comment in a story on the popular OMG Ubuntu site, but the news was confirmed the very next day in a lengthy and very detailed blog post by Ubuntu desktop product manager Oliver Smith. Initially leaked in a forum comment, it has been confirmed in a blog post: Canonical will soon snappily jump aboard the immutable distro bandwagon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |